In article , says...

"PlusNet Support Team" wrote in "Do all other ISPs offer
this without mentioning it on their website?"
No. most have removed the offending newsgroups - you have not. The fact that
it has been highlighted to you here publicly, and that you are defending it
sends out a loud and clear message about where plusnet stands on it. Perhaps
you may one day come accross pictures of your own kids on their, eh?

Thank you for confiriming this and that you are happy to sell illegal porn
dressed up as a 'usenet service'.

Then seeing as you feel so strongly about it Jik, why don't you give up your
Force 9 subscription? You do realise that you're connecting via Plus.net
don't you?

Pete.

--
NOTE! Email address is spamtrapped. Any email will be bounced to you
Remove the news and underscore from my address to reply by mail

"Paul Cummins" wrote in message
...
In article ,
"Given that usenet is not a 'push' technology, how are they forcing it
into people's homes and businesses?"

Push is the wrong word. To make easily available would be a better choice.
There is little difference in holding this material as part of a
subscription service and going to a blatent site and downloading.

Let me run this past you - if it's OK for plusnet to do it, and fully legal
why are the groups mentioned not available through the likes of ntl,
tiscali, aol, onetel to pick just 4 that I can confirm.

Seems to be a lot of support for this kind of material here - which is more
than a minor concern.

Amigo Entertainments wrote:

Mr Cummings please quit from adding that binary executable to your tag or
I will list your name, address and phone number here.

****wit, there is no binary attachment. You're using a broken
news reader.


--
http://www.mailtrap.org.uk/

On Sat, 24 Jan 2004 11:01:18 -0000, "Amigo Entertainments"
wrote:

Seems to be a lot of support for this kind of material here - which is more
than a minor concern.

there is a lot of support here for freedom of speech and open access
to the internet. If you want to be nannied go to AOL.

I know there's a sewer out there, so I don't look into manholes.
I also try to avoid cities.

Phil

On Sat, 24 Jan 2004 08:06:33 UTC, "Amigo Entertainments"
wrote:


"PlusNet Support Team" wrote in message "provided you
can remain rational and avoid
stooping to the level you just did. "

Which is quite rich from a pedler of child porn.....

So when are you closing your Force 9 account?

--
Bob Eager
rde at tavi.co.uk
PC Server 325*4; PS/2s 9585, 8595, 9595*2, 8580*3,
P70...

In article ,
(Amigo Entertainments) wrote:

To make easily available would be a better choice.
There is little difference in holding this material as part of a
subscription service and going to a blatent site and downloading.

So why are you criticising Plus.Net? why not have a go at
www.innocentangels.com or www.californiavirgins.com? Or even
www.yahoo.com - there is 'child porn' (sic) freely available on there
and you don't even need to subscribe.

if it's OK for plusnet to do it, and fully legal
why are the groups mentioned not available through the likes of ntl,
tiscali, aol, onetel to pick just 4 that I can confirm.

Because none of those companies offer a news service specifically for
binary groups.

Seems to be a lot of support for this kind of material here - which
is more
than a minor concern.

No support for child pornographers, just for freedom of speech - which
your next post appears to be trying to stifle. Especially since it is
your newsreader at fault. I am posting no attachments whatsoever - to do
so would be a breach of the group charter.

--
Paul Cummins - Always a NetHead
Wasting Bandwidth since 1981

begin Who gives a **** about Outlook Express anyway.exe

In article ,
(Bob Eager) wrote:

Which is quite rich from a pedler of child porn.....

So when are you closing your Force 9 account?

A little aftert plus.net process my abuse complaint, I hope.

--
Paul Cummins - Always a NetHead
Wasting Bandwidth since 1981

begin Who gives a **** about Outlook Express anyway.exe

On Sat, 24 Jan 2004 11:02:57 UTC, "Amigo Entertainments"
wrote:

Mr Cummings please quit from adding that binary executable to your tag or I
will list your name, address and phone number here.

There isn't ooe. You are reading news with a broken newsreader that just
thinks there is...

--
Bob Eager
rde at tavi.co.uk
PC Server 325*4; PS/2s 9585, 8595, 9595*2, 8580*3,
P70...

On Sat, 24 Jan 2004 11:50 +0000 (GMT Standard Time),
(Paul Cummins) wrote:

begin Who gives a **** about Outlook Express anyway.exe

class !

On Sat, 24 Jan 2004 11:07:30 +0000, Bob { Goddard }
wrote:

Amigo Entertainments wrote:

Mr Cummings please quit from adding that binary executable to your tag or
I will list your name, address and phone number here.

****wit, there is no binary attachment. You're using a broken
news reader.

He is - it's called Outlook Express. Quite ironic really...

d

_____________________________

http://www.pearce.uk.com