![]() |
|
Welcome to BroadbanterBanter. You are currently viewing as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and other FREE features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload your own photos and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today. |
| | |||||||
| uk.comp.home-networking (UK home networking) (uk.comp.home-networking) Discussion of all aspects of computer networking in the home, regardless of the platforms, software, topologies and protocols used. Examples of topics include recommendations for hardware or suppliers (e.g. NICs and cabling), protocols, servers, and specific network software. Advertising is not allowed. |
| Tags: copy , network , slow , vista |
|
| | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#11
| |||
| |||
| "Conor" wrote in message ... There must be a fix - anyone? Yeah..WINDOWS UPDATE. The slow network transfer fix is in an automatic update and also in SP1. I have read reports that the issue is still prevalent post sp1.... Gaz |
| Ads |
|
#12
| |||
| |||
| LR wrote: Alex Fraser wrote: LR wrote: Ric wrote: I'm not alone in this but I've not seen a definitive guide to why it's so slow http://blogs.technet.com/markrussinovich/archive/2008/02/04/2826167.aspx Interesting, but (unless I misread) suggests it should be no worse than XP, which could hardly be less true in my (admittedly limited) experience of Vista. When SP1 was released anandtech did do a write up on some of the changes and they did make this comment "Finally, and the reason that Microsoft believes is the root of most of the Vista complaints, Explorer under XP cheated a bit with file copying operations; it considered the job done once it had finished writing a file to the write cache. Vista meanwhile doesn't consider the job done until it is done writing the file to disk, so Vista will almost never “win"" http://www.anandtech.com/systems/sho...spx?i=3233&p=3 Yeah, that's covered by the blog above, and will make copying between local drives where the destination has write caching enabled appear slightly slower even if it is exactly as fast. I say "slightly" because usually only fast/fixed devices - ie HDDs - will have write caching enabled, and in that case the difference is seconds regardless of the size of the job. I was really referring to the original issue: slow transfer rates for copying over a network. In this case, the time taken for the copy dialogue box to disappear might be significantly longer due to the caching issue, but what I've seen (and others have reported) is far lower network utilisation: XP on a fairly modern machine all but saturated 100Mbit Ethernet, while Vista didn't come close. Alex |
|
#13
| |||
| |||
| No problems with vista here - just as quick as XP. Try getting it configured properly. OSX I just find a hand holding irritatation...just sold my last one - me and macs just never clicked! |
|
#14
| |||
| |||
| On 22 Jun, 16:43, "john" wrote: No problems with vista here - just as quick as XP. Try getting it configured properly. OSX I just find a hand holding irritatation...just sold my last one - me and macs just never clicked! Try getting it configured properly? You mean by researching the problem, making some changes, then posting the details on Usenet with a request for help? Brilliant, sheer brilliance. Thank you *so* much for your insight. |
|
#15
| |||
| |||
| "Synapse Syndrome" wrote in message ... If you have lots of files to copy, use Robocopy instead, which has a lot of other advantages, and is a lot faster. There is a GUI for it, but it's mostly useful just for making scripts. For a faster GUI drag and drop sort of solution, I am going to look into making a custom button in Total Commander, to use Robocopy with switches to keep timestamps intact. I have been meaning to do this for a couple of weeks, but I should have time to experiment this weekend. I have sorted out a custom button in Total Commander, which uses all the Robocopy switches I want, keeping the timestamps intact. If anybody is interested, I'll post the full details on how to do it. I'm really happy with this solution, personally. ss. |
|
#16
| |||
| |||
| On Wed, 9 Jul 2008 23:51:06 +0100, "Synapse Syndrome" wrote: "Synapse Syndrome" wrote in message ... If you have lots of files to copy, use Robocopy instead, which has a lot of other advantages, and is a lot faster. There is a GUI for it, but it's mostly useful just for making scripts. For a faster GUI drag and drop sort of solution, I am going to look into making a custom button in Total Commander, to use Robocopy with switches to keep timestamps intact. I have been meaning to do this for a couple of weeks, but I should have time to experiment this weekend. I have sorted out a custom button in Total Commander, which uses all the Robocopy switches I want, keeping the timestamps intact. If anybody is interested, I'll post the full details on how to do it. I'm really happy with this solution, personally. ss. Yes please ! -- The End |
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
| | ||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Speed up network file copying in Vista | Conor | uk.comp.home-networking (UK home networking) | 3 | May 14th 08 08:21 PM |
| Vista Network Printing - Wierd | Geoff Lane | uk.comp.home-networking (UK home networking) | 0 | February 25th 08 08:58 PM |
| Exceptionally slow ping times, slow DNS lookup and slow download on router | Martin Underwood | uk.telecom.broadband (UK broadband) | 1 | January 24th 07 01:05 AM |
| Slow network | Keith | uk.comp.home-networking (UK home networking) | 0 | July 9th 04 11:46 PM |
| FS: Full Copy Of Synapse | Milo | uk.telecom.broadband (UK broadband) | 2 | July 9th 04 01:25 AM |