![]() |
|
Welcome to BroadbanterBanter. You are currently viewing as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and other FREE features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload your own photos and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today. |
| | |||||||
| uk.telecom.voip (UK VOIP) (uk.telecom.voip) Discussion of topics relevant to packet based voice technologies including Voice over IP (VoIP), Fax over IP (FoIP), Voice over Frame Relay (VoFR), Voice over Broadband (VoB) and Voice on the Net (VoN) as well as service providers, hardware and software for use with these technologies. Advertising is not allowed. |
| Tags: openser |
| | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
| |||
| |||
| Hi, I always wonder what is the benefit to use VoIP proxy server like OpenSER ? - what is the benefit of it ? ( I am not sure to see this ) Why not to use a simple Asterisk server can do the job ? I can see on thir website : ( http://opensips.org ) OpenSIPS (Open SIP Server) is a mature Open Source implementation of a SIP server. OpenSIPS is more than a SIP proxy/router as it includes application-level functionalities. OpenSIPS, as a SIP server, is the core component of any SIP-based VoIP solution. With a very flexible and customizable routing engine, OpenSIPS 'unifies voice, video, IM and presence services in a highly efficient way, thanks to its scalable (modular) design. - Should it be the solution of all the problems, that we can have with Router, NAT etc.... ? Thanks for your help |
| Ads |
|
#2
| |||
| |||
| On 27/08/2008 10:58, Steve wrote: I always wonder what is the benefit to use VoIP proxy server like OpenSER ? Why not to use a simple Asterisk server can do the job ? Asterisk is not a SIP proxy, if for example you receive an VoIP inbound call, and want to divert it to a VoIP extension, all the RTP traffic will pass through asterisk for the duration of the call. I believe openSER can setup the call during the SIP negotiation phase so that the calling party directly contacts the diverted extension once the call is answered and RTP data starts flowing. http://www.voip-info.org/wiki-Asterisk+SIP+not-proxy However if you used openSER you wouldn't have the DTMF/IVR processing that asterisk would give you, as you wouldn't be "hearing" the RTP traffic at all .. |
|
#3
| |||
| |||
| Andy Burns wrote: On 27/08/2008 10:58, Steve wrote: I always wonder what is the benefit to use VoIP proxy server like OpenSER ? Why not to use a simple Asterisk server can do the job ? Asterisk is not a SIP proxy, if for example you receive an VoIP inbound call, and want to divert it to a VoIP extension, all the RTP traffic will pass through asterisk for the duration of the call. I believe openSER can setup the call during the SIP negotiation phase so that the calling party directly contacts the diverted extension once the call is answered and RTP data starts flowing. http://www.voip-info.org/wiki-Asterisk+SIP+not-proxy However if you used openSER you wouldn't have the DTMF/IVR processing that asterisk would give you, as you wouldn't be "hearing" the RTP traffic at all .. Thanks for your reply. I just had a look on Voip-Info. They also mentioned some other SIP proxies. Do you mean, that with SIP proxy, we can more easily manage RTP packages ?? What is the benefit ? ( I can manage RTP packages , for an optimisation I prioritized the ports difnined into my RTP.conf .... ) |
|
#4
| |||
| |||
| Steve wrote: Andy Burns wrote: On 27/08/2008 10:58, Steve wrote: I always wonder what is the benefit to use VoIP proxy server like OpenSER ? Why not to use a simple Asterisk server can do the job ? Asterisk is not a SIP proxy, if for example you receive an VoIP inbound call, and want to divert it to a VoIP extension, all the RTP traffic will pass through asterisk for the duration of the call. I believe openSER can setup the call during the SIP negotiation phase so that the calling party directly contacts the diverted extension once the call is answered and RTP data starts flowing. http://www.voip-info.org/wiki-Asterisk+SIP+not-proxy However if you used openSER you wouldn't have the DTMF/IVR processing that asterisk would give you, as you wouldn't be "hearing" the RTP traffic at all .. Thanks for your reply. I just had a look on Voip-Info. They also mentioned some other SIP proxies. Do you mean, that with SIP proxy, we can more easily manage RTP packages ?? What is the benefit ? ( I can manage RTP packages , for an optimisation I prioritized the ports difnined into my RTP.conf .... ) Just a precision... Yes, you are right. THe communicaiton will go through Asterisk IF the Asterisk server are behind a NAT. If not, The RTP packets, can go directly through the other SIP phone without going to Asterisk first - Can I have OpenSER WIHTOUT Asterisk ???? ( If I can register to OpenSER, no need to register to Asterisk ?!!? |
|
#5
| |||
| |||
| Steve wrote: - Can I have OpenSER WIHTOUT Asterisk ???? ( If I can register to OpenSER, no need to register to Asterisk ?!!? Yes. Tim |
|
#6
| |||
| |||
| On Wed, 27 Aug 2008 17:21:34 +0100, Andy Burns wrote: Asterisk is not a SIP proxy, if for example you receive an VoIP inbound call, and want to divert it to a VoIP extension, all the RTP traffic will pass through asterisk for the duration of the call. http://www.voip-info.org/wiki-Asterisk+SIP+not-proxy Oddly enough, that link you've posted doesn't mention that this behaviour is configurable: http://www.voip-info.org/wiki-Asterisk+sip+canreinvite -- http://ale.cx/ (AIM:troffasky) ) 22:29:21 up 49 days, 1:07, 2 users, load average: 0.16, 0.08, 0.06 They call me titless because I have no tits |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|