![]() |
|
Welcome to BroadbanterBanter. You are currently viewing as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and other FREE features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload your own photos and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today. |
| | |||||||
| uk.telecom.broadband (UK broadband) (uk.telecom.broadband) Discussion of broadband services, technology and equipment as provided in the UK. Discussions of specific services based on ADSL, cable modems or other broadband technology are also on-topic. Advertising is not allowed. |
| | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
| |||
| |||
| Does anyone know of a successful means of downgrading the firmware from version 6? My searches suggest that this is not possible but I live in hope! Peter Crosland |
|
#2
| |||
| |||
| "Peter Crosland" wrote in message o.uk... Does anyone know of a successful means of downgrading the firmware from version 6? My searches suggest that this is not possible but I live in hope! Peter Crosland It isn't possible at the moment. Anyone running a version 5 should have put the appropriate blocks in place to stop it being upgraded without permission. Anyone buying a v6 is mad which is why there are loads on ebay. The v5 BT firmware is far better than the SingTel. If you have a fast connection you soon notice how crap the 2700HGV is. Max sync speed on a BTv5 is 18Mbps. Max on a Singtel (ex-v5 dual SSID) is 16Mbps. This is why for a fast connection they are of little use. SingTel firmware also lowers the data throughput so downloads are slower than with BTv5 firmware or even v6. The 2700HGV is an overrated piece of junk! It doesn't even support UPNP - not even with v6. Max power unless you have a very early/old single SSID one is 63mWatt. That can not be changed by doing the reported fix with Opera and various scripts. It reports a high value in the log but not in current to the PA or RF output. If you have a 2700HGV stick it in the bin. QoS doesn't even work. |
|
#3
| |||
| |||
| Clive wrote: If you have a 2700HGV stick it in the bin. QoS doesn't even work. Follow the above at your own risk. You know *who* posted it. -- Adrian C |
|
#4
| |||
| |||
| If you have a 2700HGV stick it in the bin. QoS doesn't even work. Follow the above at your own risk. You know *who* posted it. I suspect a well known idiot! I have wide experience of the 2700HGV and have found them excellent. Having acquired one with version 6 firmware I was just interested in the possibility of downgrading it if it proved desirable. It is working fine as far as I am concerned but I have not tested every feature on it. Peter Crosland |
|
#5
| |||
| |||
| On Mon, 6 Jul 2009 10:59:36 +0100, "Peter Crosland" wrote: I suspect a well known idiot! I have wide experience of the 2700HGV and have found them excellent. Got to agree with that, best router I've ever owned. Having acquired one with version 6 firmware I was just interested in the possibility of downgrading it if it proved desirable. Both my 2700s have now been upgraded to the version of version 6 (!) that is being supplied since the updates restarted on 23rd of June. I don't know if it just the current climatic conditions (the performance of my overhead line responds to weather changes) but the router _seems_ to be performing better than it did with the version 5 firmware. The overnight uncorrected error count (which I log externally every 5 minutes) seems to have reduced a bit. Ian -- The From address is valid |
|
#6
| |||
| |||
| I suspect a well known idiot! I have wide experience of the 2700HGV and have found them excellent. Got to agree with that, best router I've ever owned. Having acquired one with version 6 firmware I was just interested in the possibility of downgrading it if it proved desirable. Both my 2700s have now been upgraded to the version of version 6 (!) that is being supplied since the updates restarted on 23rd of June. I don't know if it just the current climatic conditions (the performance of my overhead line responds to weather changes) but the router _seems_ to be performing better than it did with the version 5 firmware. The overnight uncorrected error count (which I log externally every 5 minutes) seems to have reduced a bit. Thanks for that Ian. Certainly climatic conditions can have a big effect on medium wave propagation which is one of the major sources of interference on ADSL lines. I think I shall leave mine as it is rather than risk turning it into an expensive brick. Peter Crosland |
|
#7
| |||
| |||
| On Mon, 6 Jul 2009 12:13:05 +0100, "Peter Crosland" wrote: I suspect a well known idiot! I have wide experience of the 2700HGV and have found them excellent. Got to agree with that, best router I've ever owned. Having acquired one with version 6 firmware I was just interested in the possibility of downgrading it if it proved desirable. Both my 2700s have now been upgraded to the version of version 6 (!) that is being supplied since the updates restarted on 23rd of June. I don't know if it just the current climatic conditions (the performance of my overhead line responds to weather changes) but the router _seems_ to be performing better than it did with the version 5 firmware. The overnight uncorrected error count (which I log externally every 5 minutes) seems to have reduced a bit. Thanks for that Ian. Certainly climatic conditions can have a big effect on medium wave propagation which is one of the major sources of interference on ADSL lines. I think I shall leave mine as it is rather than risk turning it into an expensive brick. Does the v6 software work with other ISPs? -- (\__/) M. (='.'=) Due to the amount of spam posted via googlegroups and (")_(") their inaction to the problem. I am blocking most articles posted from there. If you wish your postings to be seen by everyone you will need use a different method of posting. [Reply-to address valid until it is spammed.] |
|
#8
| |||
| |||
| I suspect a well known idiot! I have wide experience of the 2700HGV and have found them excellent. Got to agree with that, best router I've ever owned. Having acquired one with version 6 firmware I was just interested in the possibility of downgrading it if it proved desirable. Both my 2700s have now been upgraded to the version of version 6 (!) that is being supplied since the updates restarted on 23rd of June. I don't know if it just the current climatic conditions (the performance of my overhead line responds to weather changes) but the router _seems_ to be performing better than it did with the version 5 firmware. The overnight uncorrected error count (which I log externally every 5 minutes) seems to have reduced a bit. Thanks for that Ian. Certainly climatic conditions can have a big effect on medium wave propagation which is one of the major sources of interference on ADSL lines. I think I shall leave mine as it is rather than risk turning it into an expensive brick. Does the v6 software work with other ISPs? Yes. Peter Crosland |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
| | ||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| 2Wire 2700HGV & Orange UMA Connection | jel183\(UK\) | uk.telecom.broadband (UK broadband) | 0 | June 15th 09 04:30 PM |
| Calling all BT\2Wire 2700HGV users | WCZ | uk.telecom.broadband (UK broadband) | 19 | March 11th 09 08:24 AM |
| Is it possible to use a 2700HGV as an ATA without DSL? | JR | uk.telecom.voip (UK VOIP) | 0 | February 21st 09 11:49 AM |
| Sky Broadband Downgrade | acdeag | uk.telecom.broadband (UK broadband) | 0 | February 11th 08 10:49 PM |
| Pipex Downgrade fee | Karl | uk.telecom.broadband (UK broadband) | 2 | November 12th 04 01:22 PM |