A Broadband and ADSL forum. BroadbanterBanter

Welcome to BroadbanterBanter.

You are currently viewing as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and other FREE features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload your own photos and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today.

Go Back   Home » BroadbanterBanter forum » Newsgroup Discussions » uk.telecom.broadband (UK broadband)
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

uk.telecom.broadband (UK broadband) (uk.telecom.broadband) Discussion of broadband services, technology and equipment as provided in the UK. Discussions of specific services based on ADSL, cable modems or other broadband technology are also on-topic. Advertising is not allowed.

Wahahahanking with copper G.Fast cut back to G.Slow



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #21  
Old September 2nd 18, 04:33 PM posted to uk.telecom.broadband
7[_2_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 509
Default Wahahahanking with copper G.Fast cut back to G.Slow

R. Mark Clayton wrote:


Dedicated fiber without the expense of multiplexers
is far more profitable.


Rubbish - you yourself point out how cheap multiplexors (optical switches)
are and by the time you have paid to splice all the 100 fibres back at the
exchange, you might as well have distributed the net - indeed you can
create far greater resilience by concentrating nearer the customers AND
linking the concentrators together, so that if a clumsy council workman
digs through your shallow fibres then the traffic ca be dynamically
re-routed.

Are you familiar with how this works at all?

Average install cost 150, and 30/m for Internet is still profit
within 2 years and clear profit of 250,000 after all costs
per 1000 customers. Neither BT (British Telecum) Openroach or VM
makes that amount after all deductions.


If only they had the incisive business acumen that you clearly
demonstrate here, they might be making a profit after all this time.


BT and VM are profitable


But the wahahahankers nowhere as profitable as fiber companies
for UK plc.


, but according to their latest filed accounts
Hyperoptic are [still] losing money hand over fist. (lost 48M so far,
leaving a shareholders' deficit of nearly 12M - i.e. the company has lost
all their money and then some).


You should work as a b******. They can better explain what a growth hacking
company does all day. But I don't see any reason for them to hire you.
  #22  
Old September 3rd 18, 10:30 AM posted to uk.telecom.broadband
R. Mark Clayton[_2_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 526
Default Wahahahanking with copper G.Fast cut back to G.Slow

On Sunday, 2 September 2018 16:33:44 UTC+1, 7 wrote:
R. Mark Clayton wrote:


Dedicated fiber without the expense of multiplexers
is far more profitable.


Rubbish - you yourself point out how cheap multiplexors (optical switches)
are and by the time you have paid to splice all the 100 fibres back at the
exchange, you might as well have distributed the net - indeed you can
create far greater resilience by concentrating nearer the customers AND
linking the concentrators together, so that if a clumsy council workman
digs through your shallow fibres then the traffic ca be dynamically
re-routed.

Are you familiar with how this works at all?

Average install cost 150, and 30/m for Internet is still profit
within 2 years and clear profit of 250,000 after all costs
per 1000 customers. Neither BT (British Telecum) Openroach or VM
makes that amount after all deductions.

If only they had the incisive business acumen that you clearly
demonstrate here, they might be making a profit after all this time.


BT and VM are profitable


But the wahahahankers nowhere as profitable as fiber companies
for UK plc.


BT, VM, O2, Voda and 3 do of course have fibre networks, but little FTTP.

AFAIK they are all profitable, whereas: -



, but according to their latest filed accounts
Hyperoptic are [still] losing money hand over fist. (lost 48M so far,
leaving a shareholders' deficit of nearly 12M - i.e. the company has lost
all their money and then some).


You should work as a b******. They can better explain what a growth hacking
company does all day. But I don't see any reason for them to hire you.


Primary school arithmetic is enough to see that Hyperoptic has been and remains a money pit.
 




Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
G.Fast is G.Slow copper - no buyers - BT Openroach shiites itself 7[_2_] uk.telecom.broadband (UK broadband) 3 January 14th 18 11:16 AM
No copper infrastruture in UK so why is G.Slow being rolled out by BT (British Paul Cummins uk.telecom.broadband (UK broadband) 2 January 1st 18 04:02 PM
No copper infrastructure in UK so why is BT (British Telecum) Openroach installing 10mbit copper? 7[_2_] uk.telecom.broadband (UK broadband) 30 December 31st 17 11:02 PM
Exceptionally slow ping times, slow DNS lookup and slow download on router Martin Underwood uk.telecom.broadband (UK broadband) 1 January 24th 07 01:05 AM
Sipura / Linksys SPA1001 Back to back / sipgate Melodicminor uk.telecom.voip (UK VOIP) 8 September 14th 06 11:11 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 10:22 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2018, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 2.4.0
Copyright 2004-2018 BroadbanterBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.