A Broadband and ADSL forum. BroadbanterBanter

Welcome to BroadbanterBanter.

You are currently viewing as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and other FREE features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload your own photos and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today.

Go Back   Home » BroadbanterBanter forum » Newsgroup Discussions » uk.telecom.broadband (UK broadband)
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

uk.telecom.broadband (UK broadband) (uk.telecom.broadband) Discussion of broadband services, technology and equipment as provided in the UK. Discussions of specific services based on ADSL, cable modems or other broadband technology are also on-topic. Advertising is not allowed.

the lesser spotted Gigabit Ethernet port ?

Thread Tools Display Modes
Old January 29th 19, 11:04 AM posted to uk.telecom.broadband,alt.internet.wireless,alt.comp.networking.routers
Johann Beretta[_2_]
external usenet poster
Posts: 8
Default the lesser spotted Gigabit Ethernet port ?

On 1/28/19 3:26 AM, NY wrote:
"Johann Beretta" wrote in message
I'm not confusing anything.* If you have a 1gbps wireless router with
a 100MB ethernet port, you can d/l stuff from the internet/wired lan
at 100mbps.* No faster..

But.. you can transfer data to another wireless device at 1gbps IF
your devices can operate that fast.

Is it strictly true that a 1 Gbps wireless router can transfer data
wirelessly from PC 1 to PC 2 at that speed? Even assuming that there is
no other wireless traffic, doesn't the fact that the router is having to
handle two data streams (PC1 to router, router to PC2) reduce the data
rate - maybe to half the theoretical maximum.

I'd say you're absolutely correct. Still, that gives you 500mbps
transfer speed. I'm not really claiming it will even do that, I'm sure
there's processor overhead and whatnot, but I suspect that one could do
some number than 100 mbps.

I have found that my router, which advertises speeds of up to 400 Mbps,
rarely achieves a link speed to a computer of more than about 80 Mbps

I can believe that. So if we assume these scale linearly, then a router
advertising 1000 mbps should, theoretically, be able to transfer from pc
to pc at 200 mbps which would be double the ethernet port.

I always plug it
into Ethernet because I get a dramatically better transfer speed.

Of that I have no doubt. There are many factors that affect wireless
transmissions, but nevertheless my only point was that a router with a
100 mbps port can still transfer data faster than 100mbps. Yeah, it
would make a whole hell of a lot more sense to have a 1000mbps ethernet
port, but it's not an isolated case.

Ubiquiti pulled that crap with nearly every M series device they ever
sold (with a few exceptions). Using a 40MHz signal, one could get a
300mbps connection, the system was full duplex which gives you a 150
mbps connection in both directions. But since the radios had to connect
to the rest of the network with the ethernet port, the 100mbps port was
a significant bottleneck.

(*) This is for a situation where there are no other wifi networks in
range and the laptop is within a few feet of the router.

Old April 6th 19, 07:39 AM posted to uk.telecom.broadband,alt.internet.wireless,alt.comp.networking.routers
external usenet poster
Posts: 12
Default the lesser spotted Gigabit Ethernet port ?

On Wed, 16 Jan 2019 23:57:41 +0000, MissRiaElaine

On 16/01/2019 18:33, Abandoned Trolley wrote:

hi there

I am just wondering what the general view is of the astonishing number
of wireless routers on the market (both xDSL and cable) which are
offering wireless connections of hundreds of megabits, but have no wired
connection faster than 100M.

I realise that most connections are directed toward the internet, and
that that majority of customers have download speeds less than 100M so
its not really a problem. However, for anybody using a media server or
any other service on the LAN there's hardly any point in going wireless
at all

There must be some rationale for this, apart from plain cost cutting -
what is it ?

Apathy. Plus the belief of manufacturers that everybody uses wireless.
I'm waiting for a router to come out with no Ethernet ports at all.

That would be useless.

Being without ADSL would be OK though.

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Gigabit V Fast Ethernet Steven Campbell uk.comp.home-networking (UK home networking) 2 July 18th 05 11:09 PM
Basic gigabit ethernet question Drew M uk.comp.home-networking (UK home networking) 3 January 26th 05 02:27 AM
Gigabit ethernet - wiring etc. [email protected] uk.comp.home-networking (UK home networking) 12 October 12th 04 06:32 PM
Is a single-port ADSL router the same as a single-port ethernet modem? Graeme Allen uk.telecom.broadband (UK broadband) 6 January 27th 04 12:55 AM
Gigabit ethernet cards Rob Hemmings uk.comp.home-networking (UK home networking) 2 November 13th 03 01:42 AM

All times are GMT +1. The time now is 05:36 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2020, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 2.4.0
Copyright 2004-2020 BroadbanterBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.