On Sat, 24 Jan 2004 18:34:00 +0000, Paul Cummins wrote:
In article ,
(Alexander Mann) wrote:
Also, you mentioned one group about teens but teenagers aren't all
underage so I don't see why any NG about porn and teenagers should be
removed automatically.
And how are you exepcted to tell from a picture whether the subject is
14, 15, 16 or 17. two of those ages are legal in any event, yet the
photo could still be of a teen.
Well a group entitled alt.binaries.pictures.erotica.early-teans.firsthair
or alt.binaries.pictures.erotica.early-teans.hardcore would by definition
contain illegal material. There is no way on earth that you can describe
16 as being early teans and anything before that is illegal.
Further more a group alt.binaries.pictures.erotica.pussy.firsthair is
also by definition going to contain illegal material. It does not
take a genius to realize that the average age that girls first get
pubic hair is much less than 16, even when we figure in a couple
of standard deviations into the mix.
Sam Fox first appeared in the Sun on her 16th Birthday. This means that
the photographs must have been taken when she was underage...
That is utter rubbish. Thirty seconds googling tells you that she first
appeared on 22/2/1983, and two more clicks tells you that her date of
birth is 15/4/1966. That means that she was 16 years and 10 months
old when she first appeared in the Sun.
JAB.
--
Jonathan A. Buzzard Email: jonathan (at) buzzard.me.uk
Northumberland, United Kingdom. Tel: +44 1661-832195