BroadbanterBanter - View Single Post - Plus Net Binary News Servers SUCK bigtime.

**Paul Cummins** · January 24th 04, 11:55 PM posted to uk.telecom.broadband

In article ,
ard (Jonathan Buzzard) wrote:

And how are you exepcted to tell from a picture whether the subject
is 14, 15, 16 or 17. two of those ages are legal in any event, yet
the photo could still be of a teen.

Well a group entitled
alt.binaries.pictures.erotica.early-teans.firsthair
or alt.binaries.pictures.erotica.early-teans.hardcore would by
definition contain illegal material. There is no way on earth that you
can describe 16 as being early teans

Lets see now...

13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19.

16+ gives 4 years of teenage after 16th birthday, but only 3 years
before. IF we consider the early/late split to be 16 years and 6 months,
then there could legally be 'early' teans (sic) in the groups you cite.
If they existed. They do not.

CLUE: computers are precise machines that will not find things that are
misspelled by a single character.

Furthermore, how do you know the content, of the two groups that do most
closely resemble those names, is illegal? Have you examined the content
of the groups? Consider your answer carefully...

and anything before that is illegal.

In the UK, yes. Are you certain that nay UK provider is offering illegal
pictures in the UK. Again, be careful before you answer.

Further more a group alt.binaries.pictures.erotica.pussy.firsthair is
also by definition going to contain illegal material. It does not
take a genius to realize that the average age that girls first get
pubic hair is much less than 16, even when we figure in a couple
of standard deviations into the mix.

Why would a picture of cats growing hair be illegal? And what do kittens
have to do with teenage girls? Last time I looked bestiality was illegal
but erotic pictures of animals were not. Whatever turns you on, I say.

I can assure you I am no apologist for paedophilia, but a 15 yr old girl
posing for 'dirty' pics taken by her 15 yr old boyfriend is not
something that the law is likely to concern itself with. Now if you can
tell me that these groups contain very young teens being abused, then I
will agree with your concerns. But at that point, you will be contacting
the police, and stop pontificating here.

So, to close, the relevant questions a

1) How do you know the content, of the two groups that do most closely
resemble those names, is illegal? Have you examined the content of the
groups? Consider your answer carefully...

2) Are you certain that nay UK provider is offering illegal pictures in
the UK? Again, be careful before you answer...

I wonder, under the circumstances, whether I should consider a PACE
caution at this stage...?

--
Paul Cummins - Always a NetHead
Wasting Bandwidth since 1981

begin Who gives a **** about Outlook Express anyway.exe