<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?> <rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"> <channel> <title>BroadbanterBanter</title> <link>http://www.broadbandbanter.co.uk</link> <description>A web interface to the uk.telecom.broadband and uk.telecom.voip newsgroups</description> <language>en</language> <lastBuildDate>Sat, 31 Jul 2010 02:59:28 GMT</lastBuildDate> <generator>vBulletin</generator> <ttl>60</ttl>  <item> <title>help..malformed email address..</title> <link>http://www.broadbandbanter.co.uk/40858-help-malformed-email-address-new-post.html</link> <pubDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2010 20:13:49 GMT</pubDate> <description><![CDATA[This kid whose dad promised him one of our kittens stopped by today and 
wrote down his email address so we could send a photo..

teh scribble is of the form christianname-space-surname@ 
vodafone<garbled>email.co.uk

anyone second guess what it SHOULD be,]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[ <div>This kid whose dad promised him one of our kittens stopped by today and <br />
wrote down his email address so we could send a photo..<br /> <br />
teh scribble is of the form christianname-space-surname@ <br />
vodafone&lt;garbled&gt;email.co.uk<br /> <br />
anyone second guess what it SHOULD be,<br /> </div> ]]></content:encoded> <category domain="http://www.broadbandbanter.co.uk/uk-telecom-broadband-uk-broadband/">uk.telecom.broadband (UK broadband)</category> <dc:creator>The Natural Philosopher</dc:creator> <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.broadbandbanter.co.uk/40858-help-malformed-email-address.html</guid> </item> <item> <title>When BT do FTTC ?</title> <link>http://www.broadbandbanter.co.uk/40855-when-bt-do-fttc-new-post.html</link> <pubDate>Wed, 28 Jul 2010 17:42:51 GMT</pubDate> <description><![CDATA[If and when BT put fibre cable in do we automatically get connected for some 
of the way to the BT exchange?
Or do we stay on copper all the way?
As it happened to anyone?
I'm wanting to know if they will be after more line rental money and a 
connection charge.
Regards
David]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[ <div>If and when BT put fibre cable in do we automatically get connected for some <br />
of the way to the BT exchange?<br />
Or do we stay on copper all the way?<br />
As it happened to anyone?<br />
I'm wanting to know if they will be after more line rental money and a <br />
connection charge.<br />
Regards<br />
David <br /> <br /> </div> ]]></content:encoded> <category domain="http://www.broadbandbanter.co.uk/uk-telecom-broadband-uk-broadband/">uk.telecom.broadband (UK broadband)</category> <dc:creator>David</dc:creator> <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.broadbandbanter.co.uk/40855-when-bt-do-fttc.html</guid> </item> <item> <title>Orange Broadband can you use your own Modem Router</title> <link>http://www.broadbandbanter.co.uk/40854-orange-broadband-can-you-use-your-new-post.html</link> <pubDate>Wed, 28 Jul 2010 12:19:58 GMT</pubDate> <description><![CDATA[I'd like to use my own router as it has Homeplug built in. If I sign up to 
Orange Broadband will I be able to ?

Stephen]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[ <div>I'd like to use my own router as it has Homeplug built in. If I sign up to <br />
Orange Broadband will I be able to ?<br /> <br />
Stephen <br /> <br /> <br /> </div> ]]></content:encoded> <category domain="http://www.broadbandbanter.co.uk/uk-telecom-broadband-uk-broadband/">uk.telecom.broadband (UK broadband)</category> <dc:creator>Stephen Hammond</dc:creator> <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.broadbandbanter.co.uk/40854-orange-broadband-can-you-use-your.html</guid> </item> <item> <title>Zen - Anything better?</title> <link>http://www.broadbandbanter.co.uk/40853-zen-anything-better-new-post.html</link> <pubDate>Tue, 27 Jul 2010 16:14:45 GMT</pubDate> <description>I will shortly be returning to the UK after a period away.

Before I left I was with Zen on their 50Gb per month package. I was very 
happy with the service ETC. I see that the 50Gb package has now come 
down in price so is there any reason NOT to return to Zen.

My main requirements are:

Around 50Gb per month with NO traffic shaping, port blocking ETC
Good UK based customer service</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[ <div>I will shortly be returning to the UK after a period away.<br /> <br />
Before I left I was with Zen on their 50Gb per month package. I was very <br />
happy with the service ETC. I see that the 50Gb package has now come <br />
down in price so is there any reason NOT to return to Zen.<br /> <br />
My main requirements are:<br /> <br />
Around 50Gb per month with NO traffic shaping, port blocking ETC<br />
Good UK based customer service<br /> <br />
Martyn<br /> </div> ]]></content:encoded> <category domain="http://www.broadbandbanter.co.uk/uk-telecom-broadband-uk-broadband/">uk.telecom.broadband (UK broadband)</category> <dc:creator>Count de Monet</dc:creator> <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.broadbandbanter.co.uk/40853-zen-anything-better.html</guid> </item> <item> <title><![CDATA[Phones don't reliably ring after putting in microfilters]]></title> <link>http://www.broadbandbanter.co.uk/40847-phones-dont-reliably-ring-after-putting-new-post.html</link> <pubDate>Mon, 26 Jul 2010 21:54:40 GMT</pubDate> <description><![CDATA[I was at a customer's house setting up broadband and put in microfilters in 
all the phone sockets that had phones plugged into them, plus one for the 
socket that the router is plugged into.

He's reporting that since then, intermittently his phones don't ring or else 
give a feeble bleep instead of a proper ring-ring.

Now he may have fallen foul of the REN problem - the RENs of all his phones...]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[ <div>I was at a customer's house setting up broadband and put in microfilters in <br />
all the phone sockets that had phones plugged into them, plus one for the <br />
socket that the router is plugged into.<br /> <br />
He's reporting that since then, intermittently his phones don't ring or else <br />
give a feeble bleep instead of a proper ring-ring.<br /> <br />
Now he may have fallen foul of the REN problem - the RENs of all his phones <br />
add up to more than the REN limit of the line - but why has the problem only <br />
been seen since I've added the filters? Surely it would have existed before <br />
as well. <br /> <br /> </div> ]]></content:encoded> <category domain="http://www.broadbandbanter.co.uk/uk-comp-home-networking-uk-home/">uk.comp.home-networking (UK home networking)</category> <dc:creator>Mortimer</dc:creator> <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.broadbandbanter.co.uk/40847-phones-dont-reliably-ring-after-putting.html</guid> </item> <item> <title>Router recommendation please</title> <link>http://www.broadbandbanter.co.uk/40845-router-recommendation-please-new-post.html</link> <pubDate>Sun, 25 Jul 2010 10:15:07 GMT</pubDate> <description><![CDATA[Until recently I've been using the Edimax AR-7084A - the old version as 
pictured on:

http://www.datakits.co.uk/store/edimax-ar7084a-full-rate-adsl2-modem-router-with-ports-switc-p-4340.html

The new version looks very pretty, but does not have keyhole slots on its 
base for wall mounting.

So I'm looking for an alternative ADSL router, which ***must*** have:]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[ <div>Until recently I've been using the Edimax AR-7084A - the old version as <br />
pictured on:<br /> <br /> <a href="http://www.datakits.co.uk/store/edimax-ar7084a-full-rate-adsl2-modem-router-with-ports-switc-p-4340.html" target="_blank">http://www.datakits.co.uk/store/edim...tc-p-4340.html</a><br /> <br />
The new version looks very pretty, but does not have keyhole slots on its <br />
base for wall mounting.<br /> <br />
So I'm looking for an alternative ADSL router, which ***must*** have:<br /> <br />
1) Access Control List to allow management from several different external <br />
IP addresses (the list should hold at least 5 entries)<br /> <br />
2) Dynamic DNS capability<br /> <br />
3) Port forwarding<br /> <br />
4) Wall mounting capability<br /> <br />
Other useful features would be:<br /> <br />
a) internal clock updated from NTP server<br />
b) bridge mode<br />
c) error logging<br />
d) wireless variant with superset of same user interface<br />
e) cost around £25<br /> <br />
Any recommendations please?<br /> <br />
-- <br />
Graham J<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> </div> ]]></content:encoded> <category domain="http://www.broadbandbanter.co.uk/uk-telecom-broadband-uk-broadband/">uk.telecom.broadband (UK broadband)</category> <dc:creator>Graham J</dc:creator> <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.broadbandbanter.co.uk/40845-router-recommendation-please.html</guid> </item> <item> <title><![CDATA[Isn't DSL technolgy amazing?]]></title> <link>http://www.broadbandbanter.co.uk/40843-isnt-dsl-technolgy-amazing-new-post.html</link> <pubDate>Sun, 25 Jul 2010 07:15:25 GMT</pubDate> <description>Amazing DSL technology.

I occasionally check my router logs just to see what is
afoot and on the most recent occasion noticed.

Jul 24 13:16:03.449 BST: %DSLSAR-1-DOWNGRADEDBW: PCR
and SCR for VCD 1 (0/38) has been reduced to 64k 64k due
to insufficient upstream bandwidth

Jul 24 13:18:03.079 BST: %DSLSAR-1-DOWNGRADEDBW: PCR</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[ <div>Amazing DSL technology.<br /> <br />
I occasionally check my router logs just to see what is<br />
afoot and on the most recent occasion noticed.<br /> <br />
Jul 24 13:16:03.449 BST: %DSLSAR-1-DOWNGRADEDBW: PCR<br />
and SCR for VCD 1 (0/38) has been reduced to 64k 64k due<br />
to insufficient upstream bandwidth<br /> <br />
Jul 24 13:18:03.079 BST: %DSLSAR-1-DOWNGRADEDBW: PCR<br />
and SCR for VCD 1 (0/38) has been reduced to 64k 64k<br />
due to insufficient upstream bandwidth<br /> <br />
Every three minutes for ever.<br /> <br />
The ATM interface is also going up and down a few<br />
times an hour on average. (now realise 28 in 19 hours)<br /> <br />
Sure enough upstream signalling rate is 64k.<br /> <br />
Speed test says the same, 1.5Mbps down and 52kbps up.<br /> <br />
I usually get 3M+ down and 300k up on test, or thereby,<br />
with signalling rates of 8M down and 448k up.<br /> <br />
In retrospect realise that minor internet slowness<br />
perception is probably not down to aging computer<br />
or an artefact of my impatience:)<br /> <br />
Reed-solomon errors are about 10% of traffic.<br />
These are *corrected* errors. The data ends up being good<br />
without retransmission. There are *zero* uncorrected errors<br />
in 0.5M cells (53 bytes each).<br /> <br />
I eventually realised that there was a horrendous noise<br />
audible on the phone line. An extremely harsh<br />
and very loud buzzing noise (audible across the<br />
room as soon as phone is lifted from cradle).<br />
More like clicks with a rate of quite a few a second or<br />
maybe 10s a second. Reminds me of dolphin echo location<br />
clicks as heard on TV.<br /> <br />
Phone is unusable, automatic BT line test says it is<br />
broken.<br /> <br />
Point is, DSL works even AT ALL. :-)) AMAZING.<br />
I can watch BBCiPlayer and it seems OK. This<br />
has been going on for days. (I more or less never use<br />
the phone for voice calls.)<br /> <br />
Here is the technical info in case anyone cares.<br /> <br />
Stats are reset every time the line comes up.<br /> <br />
ATM0<br />
Alcatel 20190 chipset information<br />
                ATU-R (DS)                      ATU-C (US)<br />
Modem Status:    Showtime (DMTDSL_SHOWTIME)<br />
DSL Mode:        ITU G.992.1 (G.DMT) Annex A<br />
ITU STD NUM:     0x03                            0x3<br />
Vendor ID:       'STMI'                          'TSTC'<br />
Vendor Specific: 0x0000                          0x0500<br />
Vendor Country:  0x0F                            0xB5<br />
Chip ID:         C196 (0)<br />
DFE BOM:         DFE3.0 Annex A (1)<br />
Capacity Used:   100%                            92%<br />
Noise Margin:     4.0 dB                         10.0 dB<br />
Output Power:    19.0 dBm                        12.5 dBm<br />
Attenuation:     24.5 dB                         11.5 dB<br />
Defect Status:   None                            None<br />
Last Fail Code:  None<br />
Watchdog Counter: 0xF7<br />
Watchdog Resets: 0<br />
Selftest Result: 0x00<br />
Subfunction:     0x00<br />
Interrupts:      20897 (0 spurious)<br />
PHY Access Err:  0<br />
Activations:     28<br />
LED Status:      ON<br />
LED On Time:     100<br />
LED Off Time:    100<br />
Init FW:         init_AMR_4.0.018.bin<br />
Operation FW:    AMR-E-4.0.018.bin<br />
FW Source:       external<br />
FW Version:      4.0.18<br /> <br />
                 Interleave   Fast    Interleave    Fast<br />
Speed (kbps):          5824      0            64       0<br />
Cells:               561292      0        309143       0<br />
Reed-Solomon EC:      56233      0             0       0<br />
CRC Errors:               0      0             0       0<br />
Header Errors:            0      0             0       0<br />
Total BER:                0E-0 0E-0<br />
Leakage Average BER:      0E-0 0E-0<br />
                        ATU-R (DS)      ATU-C (US)<br />
Bitswap:               enabled            enabled<br />
Bitswap success:          0                   0<br />
Bitswap failure:          0                   0<br /> <br />
LOM Monitoring : Enabled<br />
LOM watch configured for 200 times<br />
LOM appeared continuously for 0 times<br /> <br /> <br />
DMT Bits Per Bin<br />
000: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 2 2 2 3 2 3<br />
010: 2 3 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 0<br />
020: 0 5 6 5 5 7 6 7 7 7 7 8 7 9 7 7<br />
030: 7 7 7 7 7 9 7 7 7 7 7 8 7 7 7 7<br />
040: 0 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 8 7 7 7 7<br />
050: 8 7 7 7 7 7 7 8 7 8 8 8 7 7 8 8<br />
060: 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8<br />
070: 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 7 7 8 8 8 8<br />
080: 8 7 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8<br />
090: 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8<br />
0A0: 8 2 8 8 8 8 8 7 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8<br />
0B0: 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8<br />
0C0: 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8<br />
0D0: 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8<br />
0E0: 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8<br />
0F0: 6 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 7 8 8<br /> <br />
###################################<br />
###################################<br /> <br />
Here is a partial view of the normal operation<br />
from last year. Sadly I did not record the full details.<br /> <br />
Capacity Used:   83%                             51%<br />
Noise Margin:    11.0 dB                         27.0 dB<br />
Output Power:    18.5 dBm                        12.5 dBm<br />
Attenuation:     23.5 dB                         10.5 dB<br /> <br /> <br />
                 Interleave   Fast    Interleave    Fast<br />
Speed (kbps):          8192      0           448       0<br /> <br /> <br />
I am about 600 meters as the crow flies from the exchange<br />
and presumably not much further as the electron goes too.<br /> <br />
I had considered asking ISP to switch me to &quot;fast&quot; from<br />
&quot;interleave&quot;, of course if I had managed to persuade them<br />
I would very likely not have any service at all now.<br />
Normally ping RTT is about 40ms to first hop.<br /> <br />
I have previously noticed that I need two microfilters<br />
in series to eliminate presumed DSL noise from the phone.<br />
Phone in second one, DSL in first.<br /> <br /> </div> ]]></content:encoded> <category domain="http://www.broadbandbanter.co.uk/uk-telecom-broadband-uk-broadband/">uk.telecom.broadband (UK broadband)</category> <dc:creator>bod43</dc:creator> <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.broadbandbanter.co.uk/40843-isnt-dsl-technolgy-amazing.html</guid> </item> <item> <title>Lookout for KC52 YRY</title> <link>http://www.broadbandbanter.co.uk/40841-lookout-kc52-yry-new-post.html</link> <pubDate>Sat, 24 Jul 2010 11:19:42 GMT</pubDate> <description><![CDATA[Lookout for KC52 YRY


> It is a blue Lexus. He is a car vandal and smokes spliff while
> driving. He drives around Enfield Island Village every morning.


http://asbcommlogicxnet.myblogtoolbar.com//exe]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[ <div>Lookout for KC52 YRY<br /> <br /> <font color="blue"><i><br />
&gt; It is a blue Lexus. He is a car vandal and smokes spliff while<br />
&gt; driving. He drives around Enfield Island Village every morning.</i></font><br /> <br /> <br /> <a href="http://asbcommlogicxnet.myblogtoolbar.com//exe" target="_blank">http://asbcommlogicxnet.myblogtoolbar.com//exe</a><br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> </div> ]]></content:encoded> <category domain="http://www.broadbandbanter.co.uk/uk-telecom-voip-uk-voip/">uk.telecom.voip (UK VOIP)</category> <dc:creator>Jose Sanchez is a pedo</dc:creator> <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.broadbandbanter.co.uk/40841-lookout-kc52-yry.html</guid> </item> <item> <title><![CDATA[[OT] Display tech info of streaming audio?]]></title> <link>http://www.broadbandbanter.co.uk/40838-ot-display-tech-info-streaming-audio-new-post.html</link> <pubDate>Fri, 23 Jul 2010 15:45:24 GMT</pubDate> <description>I listen to some internet radio stations.

How can I display the technical info of the audio stream? (Type of 
compression, bit rate, etc.)

Is there some software which can do it?</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[ <div>I listen to some internet radio stations.<br /> <br />
How can I display the technical info of the audio stream? (Type of <br />
compression, bit rate, etc.)<br /> <br />
Is there some software which can do it?<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> </div> ]]></content:encoded> <category domain="http://www.broadbandbanter.co.uk/uk-telecom-broadband-uk-broadband/">uk.telecom.broadband (UK broadband)</category> <dc:creator>Vinni</dc:creator> <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.broadbandbanter.co.uk/40838-ot-display-tech-info-streaming-audio.html</guid> </item> <item> <title>Re: 0800 callthrough</title> <link>http://www.broadbandbanter.co.uk/40837-re-0800-callthrough-new-post.html</link> <pubDate>Thu, 22 Jul 2010 17:38:51 GMT</pubDate> <description><![CDATA[Peter <drop.all.mailANTISPAMMERS@gmail.com> wrote:
[0800 VOIP DID numbers]
> When you dial an 0800, the recipient of the 0800 call pays some fee
> per minute, and while you indicate you can get an 0800 that charges
> only 2p/min (who, by the way, that's an impressively low fee), that
> does not mean the companies you have used or wish to use will pay a
> similar fee.  They may have locked in for...]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[ <div>Peter &gt; wrote:<br />
[0800 VOIP DID numbers]<font color="blue"><i><br />
&gt; When you dial an 0800, the recipient of the 0800 call pays some fee<br />
&gt; per minute, and while you indicate you can get an 0800 that charges<br />
&gt; only 2p/min (who, by the way, that's an impressively low fee), that<br />
&gt; does not mean the companies you have used or wish to use will pay a<br />
&gt; similar fee.  They may have locked in for several years at 8p/min.</i></font><br /> <br />
Fair point.  That may be the case for the local plumber on a long contract.<br />
But if anyone's setting up a callthrough company the whole business model<br />
depends on these charges being low, otherwise nobody would use them.  They<br />
don't care about changing numbers, so they'll pick the cheapest incoming<br />
tariff.<br /> <br />
Don't forget the price of receiving the call doesn't include the cost to<br />
forward (eg to a mobile).  But for VOIP termination there is no transit<br />
cost.  Some examples of people providing 0800 DID numbers:<br /> <br />
2p/min plus 5 pounds/month (tenner for connection) was the first hit on<br />
Google for '0800 voip':<br /> <a href="http://www.voiptalk.org/products/0800+Freephone+VoIP+Number" target="_blank">http://www.voiptalk.org/products/080...ne+VoIP+Number</a><br />
2p/min plus 65 quid connection:<br /> <a href="http://www.voipon.co.uk/0800-uk-voip-freephone-number-p-483.html" target="_blank">http://www.voipon.co.uk/0800-uk-voip...ber-p-483.html</a><br /> <br />
This one looks like a fiver connection plus 2p/min with no monthly fee, or<br />
500 mins for 4.50/month:<br /> <a href="http://0800.uk2numbers.co.uk/0800-Numbers.cfm" target="_blank">http://0800.uk2numbers.co.uk/0800-Numbers.cfm</a><br />
That might just work for me... anyone have any experiences of<br />
uk2numbers.co.uk?  Are they connected with uk2.net?<br /> <br />
[Followups set to uk.telecom.voip]<br /> <br />
Theo<br /> </div> ]]></content:encoded> <category domain="http://www.broadbandbanter.co.uk/uk-telecom-voip-uk-voip/">uk.telecom.voip (UK VOIP)</category> <dc:creator>Theo Markettos</dc:creator> <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.broadbandbanter.co.uk/40837-re-0800-callthrough.html</guid> </item> <item> <title>Linksys WRT610N</title> <link>http://www.broadbandbanter.co.uk/40834-linksys-wrt610n-new-post.html</link> <pubDate>Thu, 22 Jul 2010 16:51:03 GMT</pubDate> <description><![CDATA[Hi,
Anyone know if this product includes an ADSL2 modem?  The description it 
seems is more suited to the American market, and I'm not sure I can be 
certain if its included or not.  Or put another way, as soon as I 
connect a BT line (via a filter) to the WRT610N the phone line drops, 
and its the second WRT610N with the same problem.

If I need to connect via a ADSL2 modem, any suggestions for...]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[ <div>Hi,<br />
Anyone know if this product includes an ADSL2 modem?  The description it <br />
seems is more suited to the American market, and I'm not sure I can be <br />
certain if its included or not.  Or put another way, as soon as I <br />
connect a BT line (via a filter) to the WRT610N the phone line drops, <br />
and its the second WRT610N with the same problem.<br /> <br />
If I need to connect via a ADSL2 modem, any suggestions for make/model?<br /> <br />
As soon as I re-connect my old router/modem, everything works, so its <br />
not a problem with my computer/line etc.<br /> <br />
Thanks<br />
-- <br />
Alan<br /> </div> ]]></content:encoded> <category domain="http://www.broadbandbanter.co.uk/uk-telecom-broadband-uk-broadband/">uk.telecom.broadband (UK broadband)</category> <dc:creator>bin me</dc:creator> <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.broadbandbanter.co.uk/40834-linksys-wrt610n.html</guid> </item> <item> <title>Incoming slower than outgoing?</title> <link>http://www.broadbandbanter.co.uk/40830-incoming-slower-than-outgoing-new-post.html</link> <pubDate>Thu, 22 Jul 2010 09:54:58 GMT</pubDate> <description><![CDATA[Here's an odd one - checking a friends connection for them - They
are out in the sticks and SamKnows & Entanet suggests a line speed of
1.5Mb/sec. No ADSL2+ avalable at the exchange... (4.5Km straight line
distance according to SK)

I've not been on-site so I don't know what their wiring is like yet, but
the chap who installed (another friend) it is unually competent enough.

Despite this, their...]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[ <div>Here's an odd one - checking a friends connection for them - They<br />
are out in the sticks and SamKnows &amp; Entanet suggests a line speed of<br />
1.5Mb/sec. No ADSL2+ avalable at the exchange... (4.5Km straight line<br />
distance according to SK)<br /> <br />
I've not been on-site so I don't know what their wiring is like yet, but<br />
the chap who installed (another friend) it is unually competent enough.<br /> <br />
Despite this, their connection is very poor - incoming is a mere<br />
160,000bps, however, outgoung is 832,000bps! I didn't know incoming would<br />
go that slow! (Yes 160Kb/sec)<br /> <br />
Stats off their router (Draytek 2820):<br /> <br />
Mode	State	Up Speed	Down Speed	SNR Margin	Loop Att.<br />
G.DMT	SHOWTIME	832000	160000	22	58<br /> <br />
Anyone seen anything as bad as this before? Going to ask Enta to do a<br />
line check, but who knows...<br /> <br />
Cheers,<br /> <br />
Gordon<br /> </div> ]]></content:encoded> <category domain="http://www.broadbandbanter.co.uk/uk-telecom-broadband-uk-broadband/">uk.telecom.broadband (UK broadband)</category> <dc:creator>Gordon Henderson</dc:creator> <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.broadbandbanter.co.uk/40830-incoming-slower-than-outgoing.html</guid> </item> <item> <title><![CDATA[> Lookout for KC52 YRY]]></title> <link>http://www.broadbandbanter.co.uk/40831-lookout-kc52-yry-new-post.html</link> <pubDate>Thu, 22 Jul 2010 07:48:57 GMT</pubDate> <description><![CDATA[> Lookout for KC52 YRY
> It is a blue Lexus. He is a car vandal and smokes spliff while
> driving. He drives around Enfield Island Village every morning. He is a pedo(his step son is behaving in a strange way)


http://asbcommlogicxnet.myblogtoolbar.com//exe]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[ <div>&gt; Lookout for KC52 YRY<font color="blue"><i><br />
&gt; It is a blue Lexus. He is a car vandal and smokes spliff while<br />
&gt; driving. He drives around Enfield Island Village every morning. He is a pedo(his step son is behaving in a strange way)</i></font><br /> <br /> <br /> <a href="http://asbcommlogicxnet.myblogtoolbar.com//exe" target="_blank">http://asbcommlogicxnet.myblogtoolbar.com//exe</a><br /> <br /> <br /> </div> ]]></content:encoded> <category domain="http://www.broadbandbanter.co.uk/uk-telecom-voip-uk-voip/">uk.telecom.voip (UK VOIP)</category> <dc:creator>Jose Sanchez is a pedo</dc:creator> <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.broadbandbanter.co.uk/40831-lookout-kc52-yry.html</guid> </item> <item> <title>Unplug  During Thunderstorm ?</title> <link>http://www.broadbandbanter.co.uk/40828-unplug-during-thunderstorm-new-post.html</link> <pubDate>Wed, 21 Jul 2010 17:51:05 GMT</pubDate> <description>My Sky Netgear  router has recently been giving me 5.3 MB download speed 
instead of the old 1.5 MB that I had been having.

I live 3-4 miles from the exchange and have 30 feet of cable from the 
incoming socket to the router so I am pleased with this speed.

During a thunderstorm should I unplug the router, would I lose the good 
speed on reconnection  or does Sky set the routers to go back to...</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[ <div>My Sky Netgear  router has recently been giving me 5.3 MB download speed <br />
instead of the old 1.5 MB that I had been having.<br /> <br />
I live 3-4 miles from the exchange and have 30 feet of cable from the <br />
incoming socket to the router so I am pleased with this speed.<br /> <br />
During a thunderstorm should I unplug the router, would I lose the good <br />
speed on reconnection  or does Sky set the routers to go back to the most <br />
recent speed ?<br />
Thanks.<br /> <br />
DS <br /> <br /> <br /> </div> ]]></content:encoded> <category domain="http://www.broadbandbanter.co.uk/uk-telecom-broadband-uk-broadband/">uk.telecom.broadband (UK broadband)</category> <dc:creator>DE</dc:creator> <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.broadbandbanter.co.uk/40828-unplug-during-thunderstorm.html</guid> </item> <item> <title>Long PAM authentication delays</title> <link>http://www.broadbandbanter.co.uk/40827-long-pam-authentication-delays-new-post.html</link> <pubDate>Wed, 21 Jul 2010 10:02:12 GMT</pubDate> <description>It is a bit of a long shot to be asking here but I wonder if anybody
has come across this before.

I have two email servers (sendmail and popper under FreeBSD) and one
of them connects fast but the other one takes about 20-30 seconds.

Clearly there is some timeout issue somewhere.

The man who looks after the system has been trying to find out but so
far has not found it.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[ <div>It is a bit of a long shot to be asking here but I wonder if anybody<br />
has come across this before.<br /> <br />
I have two email servers (sendmail and popper under FreeBSD) and one<br />
of them connects fast but the other one takes about 20-30 seconds.<br /> <br />
Clearly there is some timeout issue somewhere.<br /> <br />
The man who looks after the system has been trying to find out but so<br />
far has not found it.<br /> <br />
The delay seems to be on any kind of PAM authentication whether it is<br />
via SSH or SMTP auth for sending or POP3.<br /> <br />
The same delay is seen if the login is done with a laptop on 3G, and<br />
this eliminates explanations related to somebody logging in over the<br />
LAN to one but not the other.<br /> <br />
The two servers are identically configured but not quite identically<br />
because they are on different (fixed) IPs, are at different locations,<br />
and one is rsync-copied to the other overnight.<br /> <br />
Any ideas would be much appreciated.<br /> <br />
The servers are fed with a feed from Messagelabs (which goes to just<br />
one of them, normally, but I can switch this using the ML control<br />
panel, but I think this is irrelevant.<br /> </div> ]]></content:encoded> <category domain="http://www.broadbandbanter.co.uk/uk-telecom-broadband-uk-broadband/">uk.telecom.broadband (UK broadband)</category> <dc:creator>occassionally-confused@nospam.co.uk</dc:creator> <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.broadbandbanter.co.uk/40827-long-pam-authentication-delays.html</guid> </item> </channel> </rss>
